The Kitchen Analog and the Fiction Workshop

As you may or may not know, I moonlight as a contributor for Food Riot, a fantastic website of recipes, food culture, and food writing. This month, I’m cooking without the help of the Internet and chronicling my experience; this is my first update, and it appeared first on Food Riot.


When I started The Kitchen Analog experiment, wherein I go the entire month of August cooking without the help of the internet, I knew social media would be the biggest challenge. When my Facebook feed is full of photos and recipes, all inviting me to try a new cookie, salsa, smoothie, or fancy pork dish (I have a particular weakness for fancy pork dishes), it becomes hard to keep my resolve, to walk quietly away and stare at my cookbooks and get inspired by the printed page.

But so far, it’s working. So far, I have stuck with my copies of Bon Appetit and Fine Cooking and an array of cookbooks, old and new. And this give-take of temptation and success has given me a few insights.

The idea for The Kitchen Analog came from a day when I was particularly frustrated with food and writing and my place in those two realms. I had seen so many bloggers, many doing the exact same things, in a food rat race, all of us going for the same piece of cheese at breakneck speed but trying to dress the cheese up with different props, lighting, contest giveaways, and random acts of adorable. I stopped running. I looked at the maze we were running, and I thought, I give up. It’s too much.

I wanted to get away from the rat race. And I’ve done that to a certain extent. But I will confess that I miss a small handful of blogs and websites. I find, however, that they’re old faithfuls:  smitten kitchen, for instance, and the website for The Cooking Channel, which hosts most of my favorite food shows. I find myself lingering my mouse over their links, reasoning that if I don’t cook the recipes, then I’m not failing at the experiment. Right? Like with  it’s okay to look.

But what I really figured out from that temptation to look at old favorite sites is that the Internet is not the bad guy here. Rather, it’s replacing knowledge, instinct, and personal creativity with the Internet that can, but not necessarily must, lead to those feelings of burn-out and defeat. It’s easy to fall into the trap of believing that we must be plugged into the whole internet:  all the blogs, all the sites, follow all the people on Twitter, and DO ALL THE THINGS.

Here’s a story:

When I was in graduate school for my MFA in Creative Writing, we had weekly workshops with a professor and a group of fellow students, usually around ten people. When your turn came to be workshopped, you submitted your story in advance, and your classmates and professor read it, made notes, and got ready to comment in workshop. You weren’t allowed to speak up through the critique; you could only sit, take your own notes, and then ask questions for clarification afterwards if necessary.

To listen to the advice of ten separate voices is a good way to drive yourself crazy in the revision process. This person thinks you should change from first person to third person; this person thinks you should keep it in first person, but do it as a monologue. Someone else wonders why no one else sees the homoerotic element between the two boys at the lemonade stand, and someone across the table thinks it is completely implausible that anyone would actually set up a lemonade stand. Someone else wonders why we should care about the heroine when she’s so clearly a flaky, shallow girl. One other person noticed that you misspelled a word on page four and wants to make sure everyone else saw that, too. The cross-section of conflicting advice can lead to those same feelings of defeat and burn-out. And after my first or second workshop, I asked a friend how in the world I was supposed to revise a story when so many people saw so many different things wrong with it.

Don’t, she said. Don’t revise it according to what the whole group thinks. Rather, find a few voices to trust. Find just a handful of people who you think really tuned in to the story in a meaningful way. Listen to them.

As with the writing workshop, we don’t need to listen to the whole Internet. We can find those blogs, those websites, those friends whose advice and tastes and experiences resonate with our own culinary and creative processes.

This is my discovery, that the internet is not the culprit in food writing anymore than the writing workshop is in fiction writing. It’s merely the conference room we’re all sitting in, tweeting and typing our hungry little hearts out. The key, I am learning, isn’t to try and sit next to everyone; it is rather to assemble a good group, a compatible set of voices, and sit with them.

And everyone else? They’re nearby if you need them. One click away, you might say.


Want to keep up with my antics and get a taste of the fantastic writing the other Rioters are doing? Follow Food Riot on Twitter (@foodriot) or like them on Facebook

4 thoughts on “The Kitchen Analog and the Fiction Workshop

  1. I love this. Thanks for posting. There are so many different voices out there, though I’ve found a few I like and I’ve also found confidence in my own voice amid all the noise. Still, I suppose it wouldn’t hurt me to try sticking with print cookbooks/old magazine issues for a couple weeks. Epicurious essentially aggregates all those for me though…does that count, Dana? 🙂

    1. Thanks, Marge! I love that Epicurious does that. I’ve found I enjoy making it a point to use those print sources, but I confess – I miss certain ones! I already have a list of Internet-only recipes that I want to cook once September rolls around. But I think if nothing else, it diversifies the voices – helps me listen closely to them and pick and choose my favorites. I think what you said is the most important thing: finding confidence in your own voice amid all the noise. 🙂

  2. so, so true: you can’t listen to everyone’s opinion on who to be in your writing. You have to do that for yourself, and the proceed to trust that it’s authentic (which it is, because it’s YOU, after all, right?). And there is SO much noise out there…it can just get confusing. one of my big takeaways from the conference i was at a few weeks ago (i wish you had been there: big emphasis on food writing and the craft of it), where i happily realized that what everyone liked most when reading others’ work? their authenticity, and a natural voice. and just a person being themselves. and i think you do that pretty wonderfully as it is. 🙂

    1. Thanks, Shannon! I’m glad the conference went well, and the more I think about blogging, the more I think that’s so, so true. I respond so much more to authenticity – not tricks or gimmicks, but truth and ingenuity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s